6 Comments
User's avatar
Kathleen's avatar

Thanks for your coverage of this layered story. I suspect this entire situation is a who-done-it, suspense novel in the making as it slowly unfolds. I do agree with Dr. Wesley's observation that a full investigation is likely the only route to - what really happened and who is involved.

Expand full comment
Deirdre Mitchell-MacLean's avatar

I had a request to put the week’s posts into a podcast form and I tested it out this week. I’m really not sure that one “tells well”. I need a white board!

Expand full comment
Deirdre Mitchell-MacLean's avatar

It seems fine in writing because you can see it, but talking it out is still very difficult.

Expand full comment
Garth Jolly's avatar

I’m puzzled at how a public inquiry can only be requested by the one person who damn sure doesn’t want a public inquiry. Is there no legal or procedural remedy that can force the public inquiry that Smith is so far successfully squashing? As I feared, she’s setting the table to successfully neuter all other efforts and make this simply go away.

Expand full comment
Deirdre Mitchell-MacLean's avatar

Wild, right?? I'm not certain why (paying for it? Complying with the documentation requests?) probably some of that...

Expand full comment
User's avatar
Comment deleted
Mar 7
Comment deleted
Expand full comment
Deirdre Mitchell-MacLean's avatar

Appreciate that, David, thank you. I do recommend Dr. Wesley’s substack as well on what the benefits and limitations are to each of the six investigations.

The RCMP investigation was definitely coming, because she’s alleging criminal activity, but it might not get into the political actions.

Expand full comment